Monday, February 17, 2014

Recognizing “Protest Theater” Facades at #No2Napolitano and Beyond

Recognizing “Protest Theater” Facades at #No2Napolitano and Beyond,


“I’m giving you a choice: Either put on these glasses...

 ...or start eating that trash can.”
 (Forward: If you haven't watched the 1988 movie "They Live!" yet, do so ASAP.  If you've seen it, but haven't watched it since your involvement in the Occupy Wall Street movement [especially the encampment raids]: watch it again.)

 On Thursday, February 13th 2014, there was a protest against the appointment of former head of the Dept. of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, to the position of President of the University of California system.   The demonstration was held UC Berkeley, or Cal, long recognized and mythologized as the pinnacle and exemplar of sustained college student activism for the past half century, yet the around 500 people who attended comprised the largest political rally on campus since the dwindling days of Occupy Cal, two years earlier.  Our collective showed up in solidarity and support of the #No2Napolitano actions as the last active working group of the once thousands strong movement at Occupy Cal, now under the banners of and   While the vast majority of demonstrators were righteously fired up against Napolitano for her inhumane deportation record, splitting up millions of families, we passed out copies of a small quarter-sheet flyer to widen the scope and awareness of Napolitano’s presidency of just one visible symptom of a vast cancer eating away at the world’s largest Public University.

The flyer read:


Defend Public Education:
  • Ax the corrupt and undemocratic UC board of Regents
  • Reject the fascist DHS takeover of the UC by “Big Sister” Napolitano
  • Get BP off campus and stop the privatization of public education
  • Throw cops (UCPD) off campus and stop the militarization of public universities
  • Hold accountable the fraudulent activists within UAW 2865 for moderating radical movements
As we passed the flyers out (non-aggressively, person to person) to the crowd, we could see people nodding in agreement while reading the first four points, and then get stuck at the last one.  “Huh? What’s this about the UAW?”

Well, this is going to take more than a 30 second sound bite to explain…

Put on these glasses...

It’s not widely known why, even by its members, the United Auto Workers represents over 13,000 graduate student workers in the UC system.  I’ve written extensively [Long Version / Short Version] on how in the Fall of 2011, when the Occupy Wall Street movement finally manifested itself at UC Berkeley as Occupy Cal, UAW graduate student “activists/organizers” placed themselves in key leadership positions (in a “leaderless” movement, mind you) to moderate the thousands of students, faculty, and community members’ populist outrage against incredible tuition hikes, increasing privatization and corporatization of the UC, and the despicable administration and police tactics to brutalize the peaceful activists; to moderate and divert this mass movement fueled by righteous indignation into strategies to elect better Democrats locally and nationally with the (false) hope that they could fix our problems from within the system.

As stated, UC Berkeley is known internationally for its radical student protests, and even the prior two years (2009-2010) there was a series of building occupations against increasing tuition and privatization.  So when thousands mobilized at Occupy Cal for direct action, there was a palpable disappointment when the General Assemblies (GAs) went nowhere slowly, the Original Facilitation Committee (which was always stacked with UAW members) stalled/rejected any kind of building occupation votes with their super-minority block and deceptive parliamentary procedure tricks, and ultimately, after a week, they undemocratically told everyone to go home and reassemble three months later when they (the UAW) were ready for a mass action (as if we weren’t “ready” right then).

On Front Groups:  Alphabet Soup, shell games, and who’s pulling whose strings.  (Or: a brief as possible history of ratfucking [sabotaging/double-crossing] political movements at UC Berkeley 2011 - 2014)

It’s important to note that this cabal of organizers never explicitly represented themselves as UAW organizers, for if they did, cracks would form in the façade and begin to reveal the motivations and connections the United Auto Workers union has, in a top-down feudalistic pyramid scheme, to the Democratic Party.  They have supported the Democratic National Committee (DNC) unquestionably with their dollars and union dues (one of the biggest financial contributors of the Party in the past decades), and in the past 30-40 years, if a DNC leader says “Jump!” the UAW asks “How high?”  So when the UAW faction usurped the democratic GA process during the first couple of weeks of Occupy Cal, they called themselves the Public Education Coalition (PEC) to avoid this connection and to keep their motives clouded.  After their powers at Occupy Cal were severely limited when the Facilitation Committee’s rules were overhauled, the UAW sect quietly disappeared and formed “Occupy Education” which was the 1st incarnation of the “99% Spring”.  The 99% Spring was formed after it was clear that the Occupy Wall Street movement couldn’t be co-opted into rallies to #ElectBetterDemocrats and the Dept. of Homeland Security (Napolitano’s old job!) coordinated police attacks on Occupy encampments all across the country, brutalizing and arresting thousands.  The 99% Spring was rose from those ashes to pretend to be a parallel movement to Occupy, but it was spearheaded by the Labor Unions that were intrinsically connected to the DNC… like the UAW.

How the 99% Spring manifested itself at the University of California was with “Occupy Education”, led by UAW grad students, with all meetings held at the local UAW hall.  Again, they pretended to be sympathetic and parallel to Occupy Cal (half a mile away) but they diverted populist student energy off campus to one rally and “Protest Theater” (more on this term later) at the State Capitol at Sacramento.  By all accounts (that aren’t duplicitously rose-tinted), this March 5th 2012 “Day of Action” was a complete disaster/farce with all students going home with no objectives won, while a few smiling DNC politicians made speeches full of hollow promises and a few union organizers put a feather in their cap for their personal “activist/organizer” resumes.

With the Occupy movement essential over at UC Berkeley (despite a handful of dedicated activists) the UAW sect changed from Occupy Education to a new political party on campus Students for a Democratic University and tried to use Occupy Cal’s brand & previous accomplishments into campaigning and electing some of them into the Cal Student Government (the ASUC).  They won exactly zero seats.  The SDU existed for the next year-plus; basically as an outlet/front for new eager earnest students to get connected to activism on campus, go to a couple of long boring meetings with no rallies or actions on the horizon, and then decide that student activism wasn’t for them (and never be seen again).  These past two years have been the LEAST active at UC Berkeley since the 1950s.  Then, in Fall of 2013, Janet Napolitano was appointed the new President of the University of California, and a new populist movement fell into the lap of the UAW sect… to take over and ratfuck.

It is worth noting that our working groups/collectives (@CalOpenU and @bpOffCampus) were far from dormant in the two years since the decline of Occupy Cal: we were extremely busy with our limited resources, researching, holding public teach-outs about Public Education, privatization, the Regents, BP; we networked with other groups around the Bay Area, attending many environmental rallies about Climate Change and Fossil Fuels; we had direct actions, staged guerrilla theater actions on campus and more.  All this time, we held out the olive branch to the UAW faction (and their minions) on campus, inviting them to work with us, hoping that we could bury the hatchet, work past our differences for the betterment of all activism at UC Berkeley.  All of these attempts were roundly rejected by this UAW sect.  They shunned anyone who even associated with us and defriended people on Facebook who promoted our events.

So when Napolitano was appointed, without being asked the UAW jumped to the front of the growing movement against her, now calling themselves the Coalition for Public Education (CPE).  They called a public meeting to “democratically” decide how to say “No 2 Napolitano”.  Incredibly (except to those of us paying attention the past two years) the UAW/CPE managed to pull off what they did against Occupy Cal over the course of months (insidiously transform a horizontal, democratic populist movement into a one day rally for the UAW, a top-down organization that only pays lip-service to the movement ideals) in under an hour.  At the meeting with UAW-stacked facilitators and plants in the audience, they patiently listened to this fresh crop of eager student activists, and then called for a vote (“Wait, what? Who said we were voting on anything?”) to make the first action of the “anti-Napolitano”-CPE into a one day “strike” for AFSCME(representing campus workers)/UAW grad school student workers. 

         Needless to say, there weren’t any more #No2Napolitano actions of merit last semester.  Which brings us to the planning meeting for protesting Janet Napolitano’s visit to campus on February 13th 2014; The UAW sect again jumped to a leadership role by default (of course, unelected), and the group now called themselves the Students of Color Solidarity Coalition. For those of you at home keeping score, the UAW 2865 front groups since Fall 2011: PEC (Public Education Coalition), Occupy Cal OFC (Original Facilitaion Committee), Occupy Education, SDU, CPE (Coalition For Public Education) and now... the SCSC. 

Various students group who showed up to this public planning meeting were told there was no time for announcements, and this was not a space to plug separate affinity groups.  Almost immediately after everyone settled in, the meeting turned into a video presentation, plugging/promoting the UAW organizers, and a call for support for a potential UAW/AFSCME “5 day strike”.  When people asked what the UAW/AFSCME strike had to do with #No2Napolitano, they were hissed at, and denounced as disruptors.  So members of the CalOpenU collective waited for the “discussion period” at the end of the presentation to voice their concerns.  But they were not “allowed” this opportunity to do so publicly, as one of the night’s organizers kept asking them to leave, and he’d answer their questions outside of the meeting space.  When they refused, saying they’d prefer to address this situation publicly, a member of the UAW/#No2Napolitano organizing faction publicly, in front of many witnesses, called CalOpenU “cops”.

On Snitchjacketing:

                Ever since some of us began questioning Occupy Education’s political role in co-opting Occupy Cal in February 2012, we’ve endured all kinds of attacks on our character: baseless mudslinging, defamation, accusations of embezzlement, disinformation etc: I must emphasize, this has been entirely one-sided.  Whatever political attacks we’ve made in the public sphere against this UAW sect, they’ve been just that: political, not personal.  In the article’s I’ve wrote (or even in my social media feeds), I’ve NEVER ONCE named a single name.  Instead of writing a rebuttal to my damning article, the UAW used their Big Labor influence to pressure my publisher, to censor the article, removing it from the site.  They’ve quietly let leak even more disinformation; take this [paraphrased] exchange I had with a student activist at UC Berkeley in the 80s: “Hey, did you ever read my article?”--- “No, I haven’t. Is that the one where you call people in the UAW cops?”

                There is a HUGE difference between pointing out that Unions like the UAW and AFSCME are intrinsically connected to the Police State, and saying that certain members within the union are cops!  One is examining how in the UAW has donated millions for the Obama against their own working class’ interests; that UAW dues help elect the President who appointed the Secretary of Homeland  Security Janet Napolitano who was responsible for more deportations, more broken up families than any other president in US history; that AFSCME as a union represents over 60,000 prison guards across the United States, therefore they support the Prison Industrial Complex, the School to Prison Pipeline, and inhumane laws that keep undocumented immigrants in cages longer; yes there is a difference between pointing out the inconvenient  truths of Big Labor’s ties to the Police State in the US in 2014 (which is what I did), and calling individual activists cops, which is what the UAW/#No2Napolitano organizing faction did to us, making them snitchjacketers.

                Snitchjacketing:  “When a member of an organization is set up to appear to be an informer or a cop in order to get that person killed or to instigate some organizational disruption or split. This counter-intelligence tactic was carried out by the FBI COINTELPRO program against members of radical political organization such as the Black Panther Party.”  Without naming the specific individual in question, let me point out this wasn’t a naïve 19 year old student yelling out in the heat of the moment without knowing any better: this comes from someone who has been organizing around Occupy Oakland (which had its own infamous case of snitchjacketing), and the Bay Area for years, and damn well knows snitchjacketing is extremely dangerous. 

Onto February 13th 2014, the day of the #No2Napolitano protests:

                I arrived at the Sutjada Dal Hall (SD Hall) at 10am; just in time to see some UC administration top brass in their Sunday best to meet with Napolitano sneak in the back “Trash Only” exit of the building to avoid another student immigration rights group protesting out in front.  I tried to follow the admins in, but I was hassled by the UCPD, as apparently the public wasn’t allowed in that “Trash Only” exit due to a rule they made up on the spot.  I waited for the main rally of the day begin at 1pm on Sproul Plaza, taking a role of observer and dialoguing with anyone who wanted to engage on the prospect of this rally being usurped and turned into a UAW/AFSCME publicity stunt.

                The rally began with genuine, contagious energy that had around 500 student protests, a majority of them people of color picketing in a circle around Upper Sproul Plaza, chanting “Hey Hey! Ho Ho!  Napolitano has got to go!”  As someone who has been to a fair share of dud demonstrations on campus in the past couple of years, it was really nice to see students finally fired up about something again.  Then the speeches began…


---There really ought to be a DeCal (a nontraditional set of classes taught at Cal) on How to Protest: The first topic would be “Basic Bullhorn Use 101”.  In my years of activism, I’d say a good two-thirds of people grabbing a megaphone were partially to totally inept in how to use this relatively old piece of technology.  People can seem to grasp the idea that even though a bullhorn amplifies your voice, you still have to project your voice; you still have to speak clearly.  Otherwise people can’t hear you beyond ten feet. 

The organizers of the rally brought for the two worst bullhorns I’ve ever come across in my life that could still be technically called “bullhorns”.  This isn’t hyperbole: I’ve seen traffic cones be put to better use.

So the amassed crowd listened to a tinny bullhorn project long winded speeches that couldn’t be heard more than 10 feet out.  The previously charged up crowd began to dwindle.

#ProTip for the ~97% of people gathered at #No2Napolitano who fervently, genuinely want this monster dismissed as UC President: If you are going to use a bullhorn, don’t read from a document, SPEAK FROM YOUR FUCKING HEART!!!  If you have a document in hand, fucking bullet point it and pass the mike.  This isn’t the 1950s, where random people off the streets gather to hear the news from a leader on a soapbox: People attending protest rallies in 2014 are generally well informed on the political subjects at hand.  Unless you are Joe or Josephine Charisma (and you probably aren’t), your more than 120 second speech at the bullhorn is hurting the energy and momentum of the action.  This isn’t about you.  (And no, in 1963, it wasn’t about Mario Savio either, even though the damn Sproul Steps are named after him.)

After about an hour, the #No2Napolitano marched deeper into campus, to the Memorial Glade, where we were treated to… you guessed it: more de-energizing, long winded speeches that only 33% of the crowd could hear.  This second stop was designed so the UAW sect could slip ahead, and “occupy” the Blum Center building.

On vanguards “Occupying” the wrong fucking building:

          As the #No2Napolitano march, now down to about 300 people, neared the SD Hall where Janet was meeting with UC brass, the crowd was led instead to an adjacent building, the Blum Center for Developing Economies, named after the one of the sitting UC Regents, Richard Blum (husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein and otherwise all-around plutocratic asshole) who appointed Napolitano.  Let me be clear: with a fired up crowd still 500 strong #No2Napolitano a brave contingent could have easily stormed the SD Hall where she actually was, stopped the meeting, occupied the building, and made international news.  The 300 tepid protesters who remained still could have supported the maybe 50 or 60 still left in the crowd who were willing and eager to take direct action, and could have stormed SD Hall!   This would have created international headlines, capturing the imagination of a whole new wave of student activism!  The potential squandered at #No2Napolitano is downright shameful.  (This grad student, who isn't part of our collective, nails it in this CounterPunch article) .

                Instead the 300 students, most of them attending their first protest, were docilely led to watch the UAW vanguard sect occupying the wrong building, raising their fists in “resistance” behind huge plate glass windows.  Many of the 300 outside the building, after cheering on those 11 people inside (the so-called “Blum 11” … sigh), were eager to join them in the occupation.  “No, no!” said the leaders outside, “we’re just here to support those inside. “   As the students grew anxious at this turn of events (and the plan they were not privy to), the leaders to the bullhorns and gave more long-winded go-nowhere speeches while the Blum 11 paraded inside, waving to the crowd, using the windowed staircase like a fashion show runway… but, because, for you know… activism!

                While other members of our collective tried to engage with people in the crowd on a one on one level, I took a theatrical nap under a tree to symbolically show that this protest and unending inaudible bullhorn droning wasn’t just putting me to sleep, but also the Powers That Be who felt absolutely no threat from this phase of the protest/”occupation”.  I was happily woken from my “slumber” when a veteran activist from another immigrants’ rights coalition used their collective’s bullhorn (IE functioning) to fire up the crowd with impassioned bullet points against Napolitano.  The spacing and acoustics of the nearby campus buildings were as such, that if even a marginally competent person grabbed the megaphone, the message could be heard over 100 yards away, instead of the 10 feet that was being broadcast to 95% of the time.  

(Look at those faces: "This isn't part of the script!")
 As the crowd got excited again, the #No2Napolitano “leaders” on the outside quickly announced “They aren’t with us!” and got the crowd to mic-check chant the other protesting collective into silence… so that the droning could continue unabated.  There was not any semblance of democratizing the bullhorn, access was only granted via cronyism.  In fact, ANY dissenting, or even just questioning voices were quickly hissed or shouted down.  Some Stalinist bullshit right there…

Those outside eventually dwindled down to under 50, as there waiting for a “Manifesto” from the “Blum 11” to give them some reason to remain.  For hours they waited outside, on the concrete, with no thought from any of the organizers to supply food or water.  Eventually a tub of popcorn and a loaf of bread arrived.   ---Really?  You ask dozens of people to turn their direct action activism participation into ground support for a vanguard, and you can’t shell out $75 to have 10 two-topping Domino’s pizzas delivered to the protest?  (As a dedicated veteran activist, I consider it my duty to have firm knowledge on local pizza status/pricing).  Finally, the “Manifesto” was delivered.

On Fake Activism or “Protest Theater”:

                To be clear, Theatrical Protests are awesome; they have to power to transform the stagnant reciting of grievances into creative dynamic performances that have the potential (when done well) to stick with those viewing for far longer than conventional methods.  “Protest Theater” on the other hand, is a different beast entirely.

                Rallies, demonstrations, marches all serve legitimate functions in protesting: They raise awareness to (whichever) cause.  But when the rallies and marches are an end to themselves, IE they don’t create genuine “civil disobedience” where the day to day status quo aren’t meaningfully disrupted and interrupted; this is the beginning of “Protest Theater”.

More cynically, “Protest Theater” is an action or event that claims to create change but the organizers know beforehand that it is a prefabricated illusion of populist momentum designed to popularize and legitimize the “Leaders” or organizers of the event on the backs of (usually unpaid) volunteer labor. 

For example, shutting down the Port of Oakland like Occupy Oakland did on Nov 2nd 2011 was quite a legitimate protest, with a good numbers of unions working together a mass of citizenry and activists stop the flow of capital in a “General Strike” the likes of which hadn’t been seen in this country for 70 years.  After then, one union (of many), the SEIU gradually withdrew from Occupy to be in the 99% Spring (on top-down orders from the DNC).  They chose not to participate in Occupy Oakland’s call for another General Strike on May Day 2012, and instead promised a “Wisconsin-style Uprising” the day before on April 30th at San Francisco’s City Hall.  Instead of Occupying the City Hall, they held a permitted rally where they chanted, clapped, tepidly sang some old union songs, and when their permitted hour was up, they quietly left the building.  That’s protest theater.

Protest Theater has insidiously evolved since, with no better example coming to mind than the environmentalist group 350 dot Org’s rally at the Chevron station in Richmond CA.  Thousands of people, angry at Chevron’s local pollution disasters, didn’t march to picket the refining station, or block work shifts from entering or exiting.  The mayor of Richmond and 350 dot org organizers had colluded and preplanned the day’s events with the Richmond police.  Over 200 people lined up in front of the Chevron refinery to wait their turn to participate in civil disobedience arrest-theater.  One by one Richmond cops put zip ties on “protesters” only to have them removed 5 minutes later, without being cited or booked.  But the headlines across the country read “Over Two Hundred People Arrested at Chevron Refinery” and “Rockefeller-funded douche-canoe and 350 dot org top pimp” Bill McKibben got to put another feather in his cap.  Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. are rolling over in their graves.

“But isn’t some protest better than no protest?”  It would seem so, on the elementary mathematics surface, but let’s factor in a few more variables and advance to at least Pre-Algebra, shall we?  Even a 12 year old can deduce that an act of “Protest Theater” can harm the larger movement  when it draws attention away from people on the front lines; using the anti-fossil fuel example, those people risking arrest and severe jail terms for blockading pipelines (and otherwise actually getting shit done) in Canada and the USA.

From start to finish, the #No2Napolitano demonstration was “Protest Theater”, designed to draw power away from eager new student protesters while simultaneously enhancing the activist profiles of a few select organizers.  Their “Manifesto” can easily be debunked as hogwash.  The “Manifesto” has a lot of information on how the UC Regents are undemocratically appointed, and how Napolitano’s presidency is illegitimate: but who elected the UAW/”Blum 11” into leadership positions of #No2Napolitano; how legitimate are their proclamations?  The “Blum 11” were going to occupy the Blum building, calling for:

1.       “UC Berkeley Chancellor Dirks to publicly renounce Janet Napolitano” = To create the kind of pressure necessary for Dirks to make such a career killing statement would require a lot more than 11 people in a “occupying” a building that would be vacant over the weekend anyway:  those 11 people went to the wrong building and turned away hundreds of others from joining them.

2.       “For all those in solidarity to cancel classes tomorrow (Friday, Feb 13), and for people to build a strike in support of Napolitano’s resignation and for the democratization of the University.”  This coming from the UAW sect that were among the Original Facilitation Committee at Occupy Cal in Nov 2011 would be quite laughable if it weren’t so hypocritical. This sect claimed this kind of student strike; during the high point of Occupy Cal with thousands amassed and ready; would take 10 weeks and then an additional month to pull off!  But these 60, mostly neophyte, #No2Napolitano protesters (as earnest as they are) were to scramble and pull off a campus wide strike in under 16 hours!  Riiiiiiiight…

3.       “Full amnesty for all those reclaiming campus space, including those who have taken the Blum Center.” = the Golden Parachute/Get Out Jail Free card.  The only objective achievable; and the only one they cared about getting.  And the precedent had been set for this strategy to work when yet even another Immigrant-Student-Rights group occupied another building on campus late 2012.  They also had a large list of demands that included amnesty for the protesters, and hours later they un-occupied with only amnesty won.  The veteran activists observing at the time cynically thought “Great! Any group can now take any building, ask for the moon and the stars, settle for just amnesty, and come down as radical student activist heroes”  Which is what’s happening now with the UAW sect and their Protest Theater.

           By the way, I’m not just talking out of my ass here when it comes to building occupations and tactics therein: I was part of an Occupy Cal action in Jan 2012 where we Occupied the Anthropology Library in order to re-staff a dormant position and to open the library back to its 9-6pm hours instead of the new 12-5pm hours that began that semester.  In a 50 hour occupation, we forced the Administration to meet all of our demands, and the next day, the library opened its doors at 9am.  (A further “by the way”: the UAW/Occupy Education sect came en masse into our Occupation-In-Progress and tried to vote it down, telling us to go home.  They failed.)

On "I’m giving you a choice: Either put on these glasses, or start eating that trash can."

"They can see..."

                Seeing through the façade of “Protest Theater” should be incredibly simple: all it takes is an open mind, and some basic critical thinking skills.  Yet for reasons that are still incredibly baffling to me, many of my Occupy comrades have this sort of blind allegiance to Business Unionism that provokes a knee-jerk response that closes their mind and dulls their otherwise razor sharp critical thinking skills when it comes to activists critiquing Unions.  (From a “leftist” point of view, mind you; not right wing or libertarian views on why Unions are detrimental to business bullshit)

                So many radical activists of all stripes (Anarchist/Socialist/Communist, even the Green Party), especially in Occupy Oakland would (rightfully) denounce Obama and the DNC at the drop of hat, but when it came to questioning the critical lack of support from the Unions to Occupy nationwide (that essentially doomed the movement): you could hear a pin drop.  The Occupy Wall Street movement was picking up the standard and fighting the good fight against plutocracy and for all workers (not just “skilled labor”) that the Labor Unions abandoned over 70 years ago.  The thing is, the Unions kept all the money to wage that class war, in the form of dormant strike funds, sitting billions of unused dollars, while Occupy had to fight unpaid, under-supported, in the cold.  The UAW has over $800 million in strike funds: take a moment to imagine how just 1% of that could have been a game-changer for Occupy.

             Yet when I point these facts out to certain people and cliques within the (former) Occupy movement, this stone-faced, blind allegiance comes up.  I don’t personally know what unbreakable bonds of unity and brotherhood were forged on the picket line during the (theoretical) six day union strike of 1998 to get 2 extra paid sick days per year, but whatever happened, it created a free pass on systemic critique of Business Unionism in the USA to this day.  It’s analogous to unquestioning flag waving patriotism, just trading the stars and stripes for Union colors.

It’s time to dispel the Business Union illusions, and “Put on the fucking sunglasses!”

           Let’s examine the nature of the reactions (good and bad) and counter-arguments to my accusations of the UAW 2865’s involvement in ratfucking populist student action since at least 2011 (and perhaps even before then:  from 2010 “If you look at the weak (or guaranteed-to-fail) “demands” (and planned action) of the upcoming March 4th education-centered protest on UC campuses…“)

1.       Many former/current Occupy activists around the country have been reaching out to me, sharing similar experiences with Union organizers trying to divert radical actions at their local Occupations/GAs; countless examples ranging from constantly reinforcing the Democrats VS Republicans illusion, to minor things like during marches, voting to stay on the sidewalk instead of taking the streets.

2.       Locally, mostly silence.  Which is understandable, to a degree, as Occupy Oakland activist faced some of the nastiest infighting and sectarianism of the entire OWS movement that eventually tore the once vibrant, most radical wing apart.  While I didn’t explicitly ask people to take sides, by default they were asked to either claim I was misrepresenting the truth RE the UAW, or to start take action VS the Unions/99% Spring that ratfucked Occupy around the Bay Area.  So many stayed on the fence, silent.  (Incredibly, and sadly, I’m the only person that significantly organized with Occupy Oakland, Occupy Cal and Occupy the Farm [not a claim I’m particularly proud of, I’d rather have company], although I constantly implored more people to cross-organize.)

3.       Incompetence: Trying to explain away all of Occupy Cal’s failures, and the weakening of pitiful activism in the past two years at UC Berkeley on inexperience and incompetence of student organizers (IE not because of any shadowy UAW Agenda).  If this is the case, after nearly 3 years of total abject movement failures at UCB, why would anyone trust this flock of student organizers (the UAW sect & their minions), to organize a lemonade stand, let alone promote them as “leaders of the student movement”?

4.       Lack of Proof?  People who weren’t there saying I can’t prove what I said happened, even after I’ve had multiple witnesses corroborate the chain of events that I described about Occupy Cal in writing. 

5.       And, most bafflingly, people saying that “Yes, there are problems within the UAW nationally, but there are some radical folks within the local 2865. So, no…” and the argument trails off there, without any further explanation, or citing any specific examples that I misrepresented.

  This last argument comes from the Reclaim UC collective, who came to international activist prominence during the Wheeler Hall Occupations and the student movement against the tuition and privatization from 2009-10.  They’ve done excellent reporting and blogging about the corruption at the UC system for years, even publishing a reportback from an action our bpoffcampus collective engaged in last spring.  But in the instance of my article exposing UAW’s infiltration of Occupy Cal, the Reclaim UC collective has quietly used all of their activist cred they’ve built and earned over the years to basically call me a liar, without offering any further proof, dialogue,  or written academic rebuttals.  More dismaying is my Occupy comrades, especially those in a (loosely defined) Wheeler Hall 2009 clique (who have risen to Activist Organizers Persons of Influence and Trust around the Bay Area due to their activism/camaraderie 4 years ago), basically take the Reclaim UC collective’s word over mine, just on their say-so.

I’m not saying anything like everyone in the UAW are counter-revolutionaries: I’m pointing out the hard truths that a tiny cabal within the UAW 2865 local, with influential people on the sidelines unquestioningly championing them, have careerist egotist motives; and furthermore are willingly useful idiots and pawns of the DHS/DNC plutocracy promoting “Protest Theater” while stalling any real reform.

“Start eating that trash can…"

                Days in advance of the #No2Napolitano action, I warned observing activists repeatedly via social media that this was more than likely going to be “Protest Theater” with the UAW (/AFSCME) sect trying to take it over to promote an upcoming 5 day strike over wages, IE nothing to do with Janet Napolitano as a human rights violator.  This was mostly ignored.

                Later, when our collective was called cops by the UAW sect at a public meeting, I informed people that a cardinal sin of activists was committed: snitchjacketing.  When the Occupy Oakland Media/Hella Occupy Oakland collective snitchjacketed a member of the media working group back in 2012, the Occupy Oakland GA, at over 90% vote banned the 4 who wrote the dangerous article from any further official use of OO media, saying they could never speak on behalf of Occupy Oakland again.  Unofficially we as individuals all stopped promoting Hella Occupy Oakland articles, stopped retweeting their tweets, etc, effectively shunning them.  The message was clear, if you are, or if you associate with unapologetic snitchjacketers, we will stop associating with you.

                Yet in the past few days we have a virtually identical situation.  The UAW sect of the #No2Napolitano has called our collective cops at a public meeting for disagreeing with them. They haven’t acknowledged, apologized or even denied this.  It is extremely dangerous for this behavior to go unchecked by the activist community!  I even informed a number of activists via social media personally; although any more than cursory scroll through the #No2Napolitano tag on twitter would inform people.  Many people; who I’ve faced down riot cops with; chose to ignore this information and precedent and promote the UAW sect’s Protest Theater of the “Blum 11”!

Dirty Pool comrades, Dirty Pool.

            In conclusion, we at CalOpenU/bpOffCampus will continue to organize against Napolitano, the UC Regents, British Petroleum… the whole damn rotten corrupt system!  We are NOT in it for personal gains; we aren’t asking for dues, we don’t want you to drink any fucking Kool-Aid.  We want to defeat the plutocratic bastards, and we think we have the organizational experience and strategies to better accomplish this.  We are extremely encouraged by the vast majority of the #No2Napolitano protesters, and dismayed at any and all cabals/sects/cliques that would divert their energy into dead-end activism.  We are always open to new good ideas and a diversity of voices and we would like to hear from you!


(Edit/Post Script: After ~24 hours, the Blum 11, reduced to the Blum 7, left the building. No arrests were made.)


  1. "And, most bafflingly, people saying that “Yes, there are problems within the UAW nationally, but there are some radical folks within the local 2865. So, no…” and the argument trails off there, without any further explanation, or citing any specific examples that I misrepresented."

    - Well, one problem with your writing is that you tacitly assume the local UAW is ideologically and tactically in line with the national union (and by extension the Democratic Party), while ignoring all the documented facts suggesting that UAW2865 has, in fact, been distancing itself from the UAW national leadership since 2011. These include publications outing and criticizing the UAW's leadership clique (i.e. the "Administration caucus"), votes against this leadership in national conventions, ending the local's long-standing practice of supporting and financially backing Democratic candidates, etc.

    - Said otherwise, you're trying to demonstrate that having publicly put their words AND their money against the national UAW and the Democrats, the UAW2865 is covertly working for them. Yet the only evidence you present, i.e. a series of tactical/strategical disagreements between yourself and some unnamed UAW2865 organizers, does not counter in any way the documented record.

    "Incompetence: Trying to explain away all of Occupy Cal’s failures, and the weakening of pitiful activism in the past two years at UC Berkeley on inexperience and incompetence of student organizers (IE not because of any shadowy UAW Agenda). If this is the case, after nearly 3 years of total abject movement failures at UCB, why would anyone trust this flock of student organizers (the UAW sect & their minions), to organize a lemonade stand, let alone promote them as “leaders of the student movement”?"

    - The challenges and failures in UC Berkeley activism predate the involvement of UAW2865's current leadership group in campus protests (around 2011). You had a few of high-profile events (from the tree sitters in 2007-2008 to the Wheeler Hall occupation in 2009 and then OccupyCal) that withered due to a mix of police repression and apathy / short attention span from the broader student population. At the same time, you had a few smaller actions that generated local, but concrete results (notably the two "sleep-ins" in the Kroeber Hall library, in 2009 and 2012). I'm not sure if the best way to describe this is incompetence, or rather, a mismatch between the goals of many of these movements - i.e. affecting systemic change - and their capacity that only allows for small-scale victories.

    - Regarding your last sentence, people don't become well-known and trusted organizers by their tactical prowess alone (and indeed, I suspect it's a very small factor). Social networks, i.e. being well-connected in specific communities, is certainly more important. And in-person networks/interactions mean a lot more than online ones.

    1. Such insight from an anonymous "UC Activist" who has two blog posts two years ago to their name!

      Last time I responded to this handle in the comments of my article (reaffirming that infiltration of Occupy Cal happened), the editors censored the piece from their site within hours. I've left your comment up, whoever you are, because I believe in dialogue, not censorship, unlike the crew who you so valiantly defend.

      But to address this latest comment full of sophistry, pivots, and deflections: You fail to mention Occupy Education, organized at the UAW 2865 hall, by UAW members across the state (if not the country a la 99% Spring) that was a blatant attempt to co-opt Occupy Cal and draw away energy from radical direct action. And the utter failure of Occupy Education's "Day of Action" March 5th 2012. People who organized such an travesty of an event never were held to any metric of accountability, and continue to organize/mislead fresh crops of student activists to this day.

      Good on you for ignoring that part of the reportback!

  2. Did you know that you can shorten your links with AdFly and earn dollars for every visit to your shortened links.